|
Learning: FYI
Teacher Preparation: Accredit to the Profession
Fewer than half of the nation's teacher ed
programs have received a critical seal of approval. An NEA-backed campaign
is working to change all that.
Far too many U.S. classrooms
lack a fully qualified, fully licensed teacher--this at a time when studies
show the single most important contributor to higher student achievement
is the presence of a qualified teacher.
Frustrating? You bet. But a group called NCATE is working to improve
how America prepares its teachers.
How is NCATE improving teacher preparation?
NCATE--the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education--has
developed standards for quality teacher preparation, and it accredits
colleges and universities that meet these standards.
NCATE consists of 33 national education organizations including NEA,
which helped launch it in 1954.
Do accredited schools graduate better teacher
candidates?
ETS, the nation's biggest testing company, last spring released the largest
study ever conducted to answer just this question.
The conclusion: College students "who enter institutions with NCATE-accredited
programs have a higher likelihood of meeting licensing requirements than
do students with similar college admissions scores from non-accredited
institutions."
ETS reviewed records of 270,000 teacher candidates who had taken national
teacher exams between 1995 and 1997.
Earlier studies found similar results. In the 1980s, Arkansas, North
Carolina, and West Virginia required NCATE accreditation for all their
schools of education. All three states saw above-average jumps in student
achievement in the '90s, according to National Assessment of Educational
Progress test scores.
NCATE-accredited institutions, the data clearly show, do produce stronger
teacher candidates.
Unfortunately, only a little over 500 of the 1,300 schools, colleges,
and departments of education that prepare teachers are NCATE-accredited.
Why aren't more teacher prep institutions NCATE-accredited?
Too many politicians still believe that "anybody can teach" and don't
see a particular need for rigorous teacher training. So they don't take
steps that would encourage schools of ed in their states to become nationally
accredited.
On many college campuses, there's a different dynamic at work. Quality
teacher preparation is expensive, and some universities simply don't want
to pay the freight.
"By keeping the cost of teacher education low," explains NCATE President
Art Wise, "universities generate profits that they use to support many
other programs at the institution, including business, law, and medical
schools."
How hard is it to get accredited?
To gain NCATE accreditation, an institution needs to meet standards that
are set by teachers and other educators through a process that involves
all education stakeholders.
Professionally trained volunteers--teachers, teacher educators, state
and local policy-makers, public representatives--then visit campuses and
examine how well the standards are met.
Are the standards up to date?
The NCATE standards are revised every five years. The next revision--NCATE
2000--will see a major shift from curriculum-oriented standards to performance-based
standards that focus on what teacher candidates know and are able to do.
That is, NCATE 2000 will require schools of education to provide performance
evidence of candidate competence.
"State licensing examination results will be made available to NCATE,"
points out NCATE President Wise. "These scores have not been available
in the past."
The new standards will be approved this year and go into effect in 2001.
What's on the horizon?
A fairly bruising battle. A group of college presidents has formed a less-demanding
accrediting alternative to NCATE called the Teacher Education Accreditation
Council, or TEAC.
"These college officials are now lobbying state legislatures to win official
recognition as the national accrediting agency for teacher preparation
programs," notes Mary Elizabeth Teasley, the NEA government relations
director.
That would be disastrous.
"TEAC hasn't adopted any standards. Institutions are measured against
their own goals, much like an audit," points out Lynn Coffin, NEA's Teaching
and Learning director.
"With no standards to measure quality," Coffin notes, "TEAC simply doesn't
qualify as a national accrediting entity."
What's NEA doing?
Everything possible to strengthen NCATE.
NEA President Bob Chase is chair of NCATE's Executive Board for 1999-2000,
and 130 NEA members--educators like New Mexico high school English teacher
Eloy Gonzales--serve on NCATE boards and committees.
All NEA members can help by encouraging students who are thinking about
becoming teachers to attend NCATE-accredited institutions.
"NCATE accreditation provides the foundation for a meaningful system
of quality assurance for the teaching profession," says NEA President
Chase. "All schools of education should bear this professional seal of
approval."
For more information, visit the NCATE
Web site, which features a full list of NCATE-accredited institutions.
That same list appears in a detailed new book, A
Guide to College Programs in Teacher Preparation ($24.95 plus $5.50
s&h, published by NCATE and Jossey Bass, 415/433-1740).
|